Jump to Navigation

Seattle Franchising Law Blog

New Court Decisions - Red Lion Case May Expand Franchise Law

Or then, it may not. 

On December 7, 2011, the United States 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decided Red Lion Hotels Franchising, Inc. v. MAK, LLC, No. 10-34565.  In that case the Court of Appeals reversed the US District Court.  The District Court had found that the "franchisee bill of rights" section of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA) did not apply because the franchisee was located in California--and notwithstanding that the franchisor was a Washington corporation and the franchise agreement said that Washington law applied. 

The Court of Appeals looked at the purpose of the FIPA, its legislative history and at a discussion of the statute by a respected University of Washington law professor--published in 1973, shortly after the FIPA was originally adopted.  The Court of Appeals concluded that the "franchisee bill of rights" protects franchisees, wherever they may be located, if the franchisor is located in the State of Washington. 

The Court of Appeals went on to conclude that under the FIPA, the franchisee's remedy for a violation of the "franchisee bill of rights" was under the Washington Consumer Protection Act.  The Court sent the case back to the district court to decide whether the franchisee in the case was qualified for a remedy under that act. 

One might ask whether this decision changes anything.  I think very little.  Under Washington law (acknowledged by the Court of Appeals in the Red Lion case) the remedies for violations of the franchisee bill of rights are only the remedies available under the Consumer Protection Act (CPA).  This lack of access to remedies except under the CPA is a major reason that few cases are brought for violation of the "franchisee bill of rights".  It is well known that Washington Courts are somewhat hostile to CPA claims, broadly enforcing the judicially added requirement to prove a "public interest" and narrowly defining who the possible beneficiaries of the CPA remedies are. 

In my view, one franchisee located in California (or Washington for that matter) can never carry the burden of proving a "public interest" under the CPA.  Indeed, the franchisor will argue that the termination was in the public interest because it removed a franchisee that was not complying with their requirements and thus enhanced their ability to compete in the greater marketplace. 

If ever there was a tempest without a teapot, this is it.  I just hope that, in an effort to correct a perceived error by this panel of the Court of Appeals, the full Court of Appeals can avoid narrowing the reach of the FIPA remedies beyond what the District Court did.  If you want to discuss the implications of this case on your situation, you should contact an experienced franchise attorney

Franchise Dispute Resolution - Mediation

We Can Work it Out: Using Mediation to Avoid Litigation

Some people attempt to minimize franchise disputes by saying "it's just business" or "it's only money." These people have never been in a business dispute. For the business owner, franchisor or franchisee, the business is a livelihood, a part of their identity and source of pride. When they find themselves in a franchise dispute, it's very personal. Unfortunately, traditional litigation and arbitration cannot address the emotional elements of a franchise dispute. Accordingly, parties to litigation frequently report dissatisfaction with the result, regardless of the legal outcome. Mediation may offer a better outcome than litigation and could in some cases salvage the franchise relationship.

In a mediation, both parties, their attorneys and the mediator work together to address the issues and brainstorm outcomes. The mediator is a neutral party who works with each side to create a resolution. The process is entirely confidential and neither side can use settlement offers or other statements made in mediation against the other in litigation. Because both sides had a hand in drafting the settlement agreement, they are invested and more likely to abide by its terms.

Additionally, while a court or arbitrator can only impose legal remedies, a mediator can create settlements that go beyond the traditional injunctions, dissolution and damages. For instance, if the franchise relationship can be saved the mediator might suggest that the settlement agreement include additional training for the franchisee or other steps to improve franchise performance.

Finally, mediation gives franchisors and franchisees the chance to speak frankly about the dispute. A sincere "I'm sorry" or "I did not understand" may satisfy a potential litigant more than court awarded damages.

An experienced franchise attorney can help you determine whether and how to incorporate mediation in your dispute resolution agreement. A mediation provision in your franchise agreement might provide an opportunity to resolve franchise disputes without the expense of litigation.

Franchise Dispute Resolution - Arbitration

Many franchisors include an arbitration clause in their franchise agreements to govern franchise dispute resolution. This requires both parties to take any disputes to arbitration instead of to court. Arbitration is a form of alternative franchise dispute resolution where a neutral third party, the arbitrator, has power to decide the case. An arbitrator's decision is final. The winning party can enforce the arbitrator's decision in court. Decisions regarding arbitration can be complicated and are best made with an experienced franchise attorney-but here are a few things to consider:

•1) Finality. One advantage of arbitration is you get a (mostly) final result. It can also be the greatest disadvantage. If a judge or jury makes a serious error you can appeal to a higher court. Not so with an arbitrator's decision.

•2) Selecting the Arbitrator. Franchise agreements often specify that the arbitrator will be selected from the panel of a national company that provides arbitration services. The parties make the final selection from that list at the time of the dispute. Arbitrators are generally private attorneys. Like everyone else, they can act based on biases that you may not identify until after the decision. It is important to carefully consider how to be sure you will have a qualified and fair arbitrator at the time of a dispute.

•3) Where to Arbitrate. Normally the arbitration clause specifies where franchise dispute resolution will take place. In some states, such location requirements may not be enforceable in franchise agreements unless they are made at the time of the dispute. If you are a franchisor, you may want the proceeding in your home city. But what if you later move your office to another city or state? If you are a franchisee, having to travel to the franchisor's headquarters city imposes a substantial additional burden.

Whether you are a franchisor or a franchisee, decisions about how to resolve disputes and whether to use arbitration are important. This gives you a few questions to consider. We will plan to address more from time to time in this Blog.

5 Things Every Franchisee Should Do Before Buying A Franchise

Buying a franchise may be the biggest financial investment you ever make. When it works, you have the chance to own and operate your own business with the added advantage of a partnering with an established company with name recognition, a successful business model, and high quality products or services. But when it fails, you may find yourself trapped in a no-win situation with a poorly producing business and franchisor that is providing significantly less than promised. How do you make sure your franchise is a success? Use these 5 simple steps to guide your purchase:

1) Know Yourself-According to the International Franchise Association, franchised businesses provide nearly 18 million jobs and generate 1.2 trillion dollars annually. At the Bundy Law Firm, we have worked with franchisees from tutoring centers to tractor retailers and convenience stores to ice cream vendors. A prospective franchise buyer could easily be overwhelmed by the sheer number of possible franchises. Ask yourself what skills you bring. Extensive experience in hospitality? 10 years of home-building know how? An ability to work well with children? Make sure the franchise you are purchasing matches your unique skill set. Be wary of any business you know nothing about.

2) Know your Franchise-By now you've probably looked at franchise websites and spoken extensively to several franchise sales people, now it's time to make sure the information you've been given matches the facts. Look at the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) carefully. The Federal Trade Commission requires all franchisors to provide an FDD 14 days prior to signing an agreement with you or accepting any money. The franchisor, among other things, must identify its executives and describe their business experience, disclose certain lawsuits or arbitrations provide a breakdown of initial and ongoing expenses and state the conditions for renewing, selling or terminating the franchise. The franchisor likely had an attorney draft the FDD to protect their interests; you should have an experienced franchise attorney review it to protect yours.

3) Trust But Verify- The Federal Trade Commission requires that the FDD include a list of current and former franchisees. These people are a great resource to verify the franchisor's claims. Contact or visit franchisees in your area to chat about their experiences and to see first-hand the volume and type of business they're doing. You should call every person on the "former franchisee" list and as many of the active franchisees as time permits. Do not bother talking to franchisees that the franchisor introduces you to or encourages you to contact. Beware of purchasing any franchise with a high number of terminated, cancelled or non-renewed franchises.

4) Crunch The Numbers-All franchises have some start up fees and even the best business might take a few months to turn a profit. Take a hard look how much you are willing to invest and how long you can wait before the business turns a profit. Don't assume the "estimated initial investment" contained in the FDD will be enough to get you to profitability.

5) Call in the Professionals-In addition to carefully reviewing the FDD, you should have both the disclosure document and the franchise contract reviewed by an accountant and an experienced franchise attorney. An accountant can help you assess the franchise's financial information and develop a successful business plan. An attorney can help you understand your rights and duties under the franchise agreement. An experienced franchise attorney will help you protect your interests and provide you with tools and knowledge to make a good business decision.

Welcome to our Seattle, Washington, franchising law blog

We established this blog to share stories and information about topics relevant to our practice. Our intent is to highlight local stories, as well as national subject matter, that we think you will find interesting. We will regularly update this blog and encourage you to share your thoughts on these posts.

Please Call or E-mail

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Visit Our Franchising Law Website Subscribe to This Blog's Feed